Magick Mirror Communications
Phone: 212-727-0002
E-mail: MagickMirr@aol.co
NEW POEMS 2007
a page from
ASBESTOS
poetry journal--Fall 2007
editor: Robert Dunn
Bayside, N.Y.11364
dunnmiracle@aol.com

ONE ACT
PLAY
SAYEED//SAYEEDA
0r
THE
WILD CARD SECURITY SYSTEM
Click
to access adobe file of entire one act play
SAYEED // SAYEEDA
OR
Featuring (L-R-F) Martin Ewens, Erzen
Kriva, Cheryl Belkin, Dawn Meredith Smith
THE WILD CARD SECURITY SYSTEM
Sunday October 26th
5 p.m.
New Yorker Hotel
Grand Central Room 4th Floor
to your front-right as you exit the main elevators
Written & Directed by
Eugenia Macer-Story
FASCINATION
The devil you
need again in many faces
Seeming from a single heart
Now has changed
the costume behind the eyes
Draping a new veil before the savage mind
& by this
shift panicking old lovers and friends
Written by
Eugenia Macer-Story
from the book
"The Merry
Piper's Hollow Hills" 2003
INVOCATION
TO HERMES
the day I meet
the devil
in disguise, may I
already have
left my wallet
inside the peacock's eye
so that sight
stays on top of my money
as I dance and drink hot wine
written
by Eugenia Macer-Story
from the
book
vanishing
questions.
Following are the first two scenes from:
JUST 45 MINUTES FROM PARADISE
as revised for performance at the
Mountain Valley Resort--Summer 2000
formerly: Peg Leg Bates' Country Club
Kerhonkson--Catskills, N.Y.
copyright 2000 Eugenia Macer-Story
If
you stage these scenes, email Magick Mirror Communications:
SET
The
stage is set to represent the ornamental gardens of a large estate.
Several paths wind down to the front area, where there are several white
wrought iron chairs and a table.
The
first two scenes are from the past, and are played in an illuminated area
at the front of the darkened stage. The main stage area immediately
becomes bright for scene three and stays that way for the rest of the
play.
CHARACTERS
DIANA,
an itinerant peddler
SONNEY
SONENLIGHTENER, a small-time musician
MR.
CLARKE, a studio production
assistant
ANTHIE
JOHNSON, a wealthy woman of fifty, very fashionably dressed
BARBARA
JOHNSON, her daughter, twenty-five, fashionably dressed
DR.
LILY ROSENBERG, a psychiatrist, late twenties, severely dressed
THE
ROSEBUD BAND:
PEEWEE,
vocals
SISSY, banjo
POLLY, banjo
DORCHESTER ARMS, banjo
DEON,
Diana’s son, about fourteen
RAYMOND,
a nonesuch vagrant
ACT ONE
Scene 1
A
thin, spindly-looking woman sits dealing cards. She is dressed in an
ill-fitting flowered dress, and sits cross-legged with her feet tucked up
under the skirt. She throws these cards down in front of her casually, in
a solitaire-like arrangement, singing in a rough, offhand way:
DIANA
money which is freely given
never
can be stolen
hearts which are freely loving
never can be broken
who can count the petals I have
on my pink carnation?
who can steal the wild, green blades
from the roots of the gypsy nation?
Young
SONENLIGHTENER wanders in, carrying his concertina. he stops behind the
woman to listen, and as she becomes aware of him, she breaks off her song
and jumps to her feet, producing at the same time a large bouquet of
assorted flowers from beneath her skirt.
DIANA
Flowers
for the migrant refugee children, mister?
SONNEY
(fending her off)
No!
DIANA
(blocking his path)
Flowers
for the little migrant refugee children.
SONNEY
(taking her arm to move her
out of the way)
Excuse
me.
DIANA
(resisting)
Flowers,
sir: only one dollar and fifty cents.
SONNEY
(dropping her arm)
I
can’t afford that.
DIANA
(brandishing a flower)
Only
one dollar and fifty cents.
SONNEY (taking
a five dollar bill out of his wallet)
All
right. Do you see that?
DIANA (winking
and running her thumb along the
tips of her fingers in an obscene way, meaning
contempt for his money)
I
see it, sweetheart.
SONNEY
You
do? Well, that’s my breakfast...my breakfast, my dinner, my lunch and my
cab fare, sweetheart...believe me.
DIANA
(standing directly in front
of him)
No,
and you ain’t going nowhere with that bill, sweetheart, please believe
me.
(urgently)
And
do you want me to tell you why this bad luck is going to come? Do you want
me to help you out, mister?
SONNEY
I
wouldn’t mind that...no.
DIANA
(sarcastically)
All
right...so you want the truth, mister. That is going to cost you exactly
four dollars...four dollars and fifty cents.
SONNEY
I don’t have it.
DIANA
Four dollars! You don’t have four dollars? Then what do you do going
around with that five dollar bill? You give me entirely the wrong
impression.
SONNEY
Do I?
DIANA
Yes. You show me the five dollars, mister, and then you tell me you
ain’t got four....
SONNEY
(taking ahold of one of her
flowers)
Where
do you get these anyway, princess?
DIANA
What’s the matter? Do you think I steal these? Is that what you think,
eh?
SONNEY
Well, no, darling. I’m not quite so sure. Once I bought a bouquet of
carnations from a girl like you...just bought one on the spur of the
moment, you know, and when I got home I found out that the stems were all
twisted with wire, all twisted with wire...like from some...ah...memorial
arrangement, but that was awhile ago.
DIANA
Now, you don’t know, sweetheart, and I got to tell you: take a look at
the days to come.
SONNEY
The
days to come? Ah...all right, I’ll buy it.
DIANA
You going to get yourself some crazy money.
SONNEY
(offering her the five dollar
bill)
All
right. Now, do you have change?
DIANA
No...no...keep your money. I can’t accept that, sweetheart.
SONNEY
What? You can’t accept that? I thought you were...ah...a gypsy selling
flowers from the cemetery....
DIANA
No, no. Please, sir, and as a matter of fact, now, I would like to present
you with a memento from this special bouquet. As you can see, sir, there
is no wire. The blossom itself, sweetheart, is made out of wax...entirely
of was...a very special and important sort of wax, as a matter of fact.
SONNEY
(accepting a blossom)
Wax!?
It looks like plastic. This is real original -
an original routine. So then, I’ll...ah...I’ll give you five dollars,
and you give me back three-fifty in change.
DIANA
(rummaging in the pockets of
her skirt)
If
I got three-fifty in change...you know, sir, I really don’t like to say
these things, but you got a dark cloud around you now, a very dark cloud
for you, coming up...clouds and then, you know, in and out of it there a
bit of sunshine...like you got now...clouds and then sunshine, like you
got now. I do see the sunshine coming down...uh...ten or twenty years from
now...twenty or thirty, I can’t be sure....it might be tomorrow now
instead of yesterday morning…
SONNEY
You
don’t have to make change. Just stop talking about the weather. I’ll
sell this tie. Do you think this tie might be worth twenty dollars?
DIANA
(handing him the money)
No...here
you are, sir. The best of luck...like I say, the
best
of luck. I don’t like to take money from a man
who
has lost and found his luck so many times -
if you
know
what I mean -It’s
crazy. It can’t be good for the
spirit
business in the long run, if you know what I
mean…it’s
hard for me to tell what’s happening to you, mister…
SONNEY
(as Diana hurries off)
Yes,
yes. I got the good luck now, but then a little later...POW!
He
examines the flower.
So...wax
petals on the top, but there’s a wire here. There’s still wire here!
Ah, yes. “No wires,” she said. “No wires...but what do you expect
these days on the street for free?”
MR.
CLARKE rushes on carrying his clipboard.
ACT 1-Scene 2
CLARKE
Hey!
Sonenlightener!
SONNEY
What?
CLARKE
Sonenlightener, you’re late!
SONNEY
(holding up the flowers)
Late?
For what? My own funeral? I ain’t got no appointments, Sonny.
CLARKE
(consulting his clipboard)
No!
You are Sonney Sonenlightener, aren’t you?
SONNEY
Yes, yes, usually...Sonney Sonenlightener.
CLARKE
Of the Rosebud Band?
SONNEY
Nope.
No, you got me wrong there. I don’t know any Rosebud Band...I...ah...I
do play the concertina.
CLARKE
Oh,
yes sir. I know you do...with the Rosebud Band. That’s what it says
here: Sonney Sonenlightener’s Rosebud Band....
SONNEY
Never
heard of it! Ah, yes...but it’s certainly an interesting mistake, an
interesting coincidence of names...the Rosebud Band, you said?
CLARKE
(consulting his clipboard)
Yes,
that’s what it says here... “Rosebuds...” the Rosebud Band.
SONNEY
There
must certainly be some...ah...mistake here...I’m not...ah...
CLARKE
I hope not.
SONNEY
Why?
CLARKE
I certainly hope not, Mr. Sonenlightener.
SONNEY
(trying to absorb this
situation)
“You...certainly...hope...not....”
CLARKE
Definitely.
I certainly do hope not.
SONNEY
All right. All right. So you know my name. Where do you come from?
CLARKE
I...ah...Where do I come from?
SONNEY
Yes. “Where...do...you...come...from?”
CLARKE
The studio, Mr. Sonenlightener. I come from the studio...CJH Studios. We
have been looking for you all night, Mr. Sonenlightener.
He
shakes a reprimanding finger.
Th...th...th...You
should always leave a number where you can be reached, Mr. Sonenlightener.
It throws us off our schedule.
SONNEY
“CJH
Studios”...Well, isn’t that interesting? I thought you might be with
the gypsies...Yes, there certainly still is that possibility...that you
might be with the gypsies...I don’t...ah...I don’t know....
CLARKE
(consulting the clipboard
again)
Yes...well,
you’re certainly down next on the schedule. Is that your rosebud, sir?
SONNEY
(becoming aware of the flower
in his hand)
Rosebud?
Well, no...it’s a carnation...if it is, really...it’s an
artificial...ah, flower...prewired, you know...as you can see here,
pre-wired from some previous celebration....
CLARKE
(unsure)
Oh,
well, yes!... “pre-wired...” That’s brilliant, Mr. Sonenlightener,
absolutely brilliant!
SONNEY
What?
CLARKE
Pre-wired for sound. Sonney’s electronic Rosebud Band, absolutely
pre-wired for sound...but, unfortunately, we’re late...I know. Boys will
be boys, Mr. Sonenlightener, but this studio does have a schedule....
SONNEY
(as Clarke takes him by the
elbow)
Wait!
Wait! No...there must be some mistake on this. I don’t have a Rosebud
Band.
CLARKE
(hustling him off)
No...no,
Mr. Sonenlightener, it’s right down here on the clipboard....
SONNEY
(resisting)
I
just got through with a gig at Mary’s bar. I don’t have a band. I am
in a band...such as it is, of course.
CLARKE
Yes, of course: “the Sonney Sonenlightener Constructive Attitude.”
SONNEY
What!?
CLARKE
(reading from the clipboard)
The
“Sonney Sonenlightener Constructive Attitude.” That’s part of our
publicity campaign. You do not have a band, you are in a
band...uh...cooperatively speaking...we are all in the Rosebud
Band....
SONNEY
Yes...uh...I
really didn’t know that I had...uh...any sort of a band at all. How many
people are in this band, Mr....ah...CHJ....?
CLARKE
Clarke, sir...the name is Clarke. All of us are in the band with
you, Mr. Sonenlightener. It’s the image our publicity wants you to
project.
SONNEY
Uh, ok...ah...Clarke. Tell me...do I get paid for this?
CLARKE
What?
SONNEY
Do I get paid for this gig?
CLARKE
I...ah...I
assume so, Mr. Sonenlightener. It’s in the contract. Don’t you have a
copy of the contract somewhere?
SONNEY
Is this some sort of a joke?
CLARKE
(once again taking him by the
elbow
and guiding him offstage)
Mr.
Sonenlightener, let’s move along here, sir. I’m sure you understand,
the studio has commitments. We have...quite a few commitments in the
course of the week, Mr. Sonenlightener...quite a few...requests -
and we have been trying all night to find you. Actually since yesterday at
five-thirty in the morning.
As
they leave, the main area of the stage lights up suddenly, and ANTHIE
enters down the back path carrying a sprig of all white tearoses. She is
destroying these by playing: “she loves me, she loves me not” with the
petals and leaves. This goes on silently for awhile.
FOR
THE REST OF THIS FULL-LENGTH SCRIPT, EMAIL THE AUTHOR AT: Magickorders@aol.com
The Summer poem PEACHES
is archived just after the following feature and just before the
lecture on Interdimensional Perception. Scroll down to find Peaches
Or now go to the new YANKEE ORACLE site
&/...ER click on the earth fruits photo
(Try Yankee
Oracle)
or keep on reading all this olde stuff
WHAT SORT OF FLESH?
In her book ALIENS AMONG US author-clairvoyant Ruth Montgomery relates that
her telepathic guides have described inhabitants of Arcturus as hydrogen-based
energy forms with the ability to take on three dimensional mass which simulates
our own H2O and carbon based organic life form.
However, Arcturus is a star not a planet. Are these hydrogen-based intelligences
solar in location or from a planet in the Arcturus solar system? It was thought
by pre-Socratic Greek philosophers that there was a governing Intelligence
which lived in our Sun. This being of fire was called the Solar Logos
Montgomery was also given the impression by her telepathic guides that she
had once lived at a location in the constelation Orion in a body of gossimer-
like tentrils. The body of an undersea jellyfish with long delicate tendrils
comes to mind visually when thinking about this possibility.
Famed ufo researcher Trevor Constable has for many years photographed amoeboid
creatures floating in the atmosphere using a variety of techniques too complex
to describe in this brief publication. Constable's work is available through
BORDERLANDS publications. He refers to these aeriel life forms as "critters".
British occultist Andrew Collins has suggested that such aerial life forms
may be responsible for the genuine crop circle occurances in the UK and
elsewhere. Collins refers to these creatures as "bio-forms". He believes
that these creatures possess telepathic ability and can interact with human
intelligence as well as causing anomalous physical effects. If this is the
case, it is possible that another form of intelligence which has co-existed
with developing human culture for eons is now signaling to the human inhabitants
of the planet more overtly by means of the crop circles and certain "ufo-like"
scenarios which involve aeriel lights and telepathic transfer of information
and/or directives; but do not involve the observation of a metallic ufo craft.
Are the "critters" the "shape-shifters" mentioned in all mythologies,
those intelligent individuals who have no fixed shape but are able by telepathic
and other means to manifest to human beings in a variety of exterior
appearances?.
by E. Macer-Story
NYC-MUFON NEWSLETTER feature 1995
copyright 1998 E.Macer-Story
PEACHES
You will always look back once (maybe twice)
and I will always wave.
Today, sitting at the diner You recommended
( without You years now)
but finding the cinnamon coffee OK
I recall that the new bakeries
picturesque near my rennovated address
have baked the same hot crust for years,
repainting special today signs
along cobblestones
worn and round as day-old loaves.
At the next table a couple discusses
Queen Cleopatras four marriages
before meeting Caesars legions
and her suicidal sting by the poison snake.
I do not know if this gossip is accurate
only that the Old Diner still has good coffee..
Later, losing a glove irreplaceably
while hailing a cab in a rainstorm
I buy the only bargain gloves which fit:
cerulean blue suede useful but bright.
now waving with hands of a summer sky
not yet arrived, I hail the nearest cab
into destinations known only
by an unknown number
a bit of You inside my heart
like remembered wine.
a sudden cloud crosses this windy sky
like a white veil blown suddenly
from the magicians hand
as nothing appears on the balcony
shaken with new wind
but unwritten invitations to parties
or promises of balloons
falling upward into the heavens
while You pass below unrecognized
behind a beautiful scarf in the hurrying crowd:
someone I shall meet in the lobby
or perhaps not at all as You suddenly look back
just as I board the moving cab
smiling as the last taste of sparkling peaches
from the gift bottle of unexpected wine
causes me to drop one sky-glove
always found later as a bargain in the easy bazaar
round the corner from Your sweet, silent song.
from DISAPPEARING QUESTIONS
poems by Eugenia Macer-Story
copyright 1999--to be issued Fall 1999
Lecture for "Eyes of Learning"
Summer 1998
A simple verbal statement is a series of symbols which may be interpreted
in a variety of ways depending upon the perceptual capacity and level of
focus of the individuals hearing or reading the words. As one whimsical
example of this variable interpretation, consider the Bob Dylan lyric:
O momma: can this really be the end...to be trapped inside of Mobile with
the Memphis Blues again?
Obviously, as most people interpret this lyric, it refers to the boredom
of a musician on tour in Alabama and Tennessee. But when I first heard this
lyric in the mid-sixties I thought that Dylan was singing:...to be
trapped inside a mobile... i.e.: a hanging mobile sculpture ...with
the Memphis blues again. This is because my sensory perception
travels automatically in a poetical way and I can mentally spin
inside mobile sculptures if I am in the mood. It would be quite a dilemma
to be trapped inside a kinetic sculpture in the Memphis museum of art. So
when I hear eccentric interpretations of my own poems or books, I remember
that all people do not automatically have the same frame of reference upon
which to hang any simple statement.
I assume in my work that there exists a multidimensional reality which the
developing consciousness of humanity imperfectly perceives. I include myself
in this collective development process and I do not assume, simply because
I may be the scribe or poetical narrator of any idea or experience, that
therefore I must have the ultimate or fixed interpretation of the situation
I am rendering. My job is to present a communications experience which actually
communicates the essence of the event or idea upon which I am focusing. Aspects
of that experience may remain perplexing to me. As a simple illustration
of this concept, remember that it is possible to paint a portrait or make
a true verbal description of a person whose intimate motivations are never
specifically disclosed. This may actually be an accurate portrait. It is
not an analysis; it is a description of observed characteristics.
In my writing about expanded consciousness and the supernatural, I am a
journalist. I keep journals of interdimensional experiences. I do not design
experiments which create interdimensional events. I have occasionally
participated in experiments conducted by analytical technicians or psychologists
but this is not the major part of my work. I feel that technicians who attempt
to study interdimensional events by statistical or control batch
protocol often do not clearly understand their inevitable role within these
events and the connections from time previous and time future which also
may play a role in the present results they are measuring.
Actually, it is not always designated scientists who make
unanticipated scientific discoveries. As the many corporate employees who
have developed corn flakes, generic pharmaceuticals and cars which work know
from experience, a true technician will not always know why a
procedure works--only that it works. Simple working procedures
should be sufficient for human progress in both arts and sciences. The test
of a new, commercial product is not why it flips over and answers
the phone but that it reliably flips over and answers the phone. Nothing
else is actually required by the person who benefits from this invention
or discovery beyond adequate use of the knowledge..
Over-analysis of interdimensional or supernatural events may
actually obscure accurate observation and documentation of these events.
It is possible that the poverty of focused attention to these situations
has created a luxury of time wherein extra doodads of quasi-scientific function
are permitted to clutter the landscape. What does it take to document a bird
flying by the window? A camera, a notebook and pencil and in the optimum
circumstances two witnesses. This is actually all that is necessary also
to document a flying apple, six ghosts dancing the minuet in Hoboken, or
anomalous aerial manifestations resembling spaceships. Whether or not the
interdimensional events affect the film in the camera oddly is a moot point
here. It is simply necessary that some event occur to the film, the notebook
and the memories of the witnesses in order to establish that some, unexplained
event did occur. This is what documentation really is in essence.
The process is simple. But sometimes, when actually faced with surprising
events, it is difficult to be simple. The mind wants to fill in
the blanks and get in control of the ultimate pattern of the situation
immediately. This rush toward judgment will inevitably complicate
matters in the long run.
When doing documentary coverage of interdimensional incidents,I have often
been told by observant East Coast communications professionals:You
are basically laid back. Do you realize how casual you look ?I feel like
Im somewhere in California. How can you say this so calmly?The
fact is that--in situations of clairvoyant investigation--I am paying attention
interdimensionally and so my total attention is relaxed slightly from strict
monitoring of the material characteristcs of the rattling bones in the near
vicinity.
I have come to the conclusion that certain forms of materialism
and skepticism are mental conditions which have resulted from
the secular attempt to find a numinous cause behind events which
is not emotionally based or perceived but which is. in a profound inner paradox,
divinely objective.
But the medieval scholastics recognized a form of emotional perception they
called the higher affects and which these academically religious
people--using a zen-like attention to inner process--did link to areas of
experience which in the modern day are called esp, pk, remote viewing and
so on.
I suggest that undue attention to material verification in the skeptical
sense is simply a lack of awareness of the higher affects and/or
a culturally-conditioned embarrassment of these deeply felt but inexplicable
conditions of inner causality.
How often has the compassionate observer noticed when discussing anomalies
or the supernatural with a self-professed skeptic that this skeptical
individual also seemed to emotionally and unreasonably link interdimensional
perception with low level romance difficulties or stupid
religious beliefs? In actual fact, such a nominally skeptical
individual is simply asking for help in understanding that emotions of aversion
and preference do cause events to happen and that affective causality
cannot always be materially predicted or conditioned. An unruly dimension
of experience enters the material picture here.
Its not the simple, old question here:Do you marry for love or
for money? but the question of luck of affinity and of
necessity. Not for love or for money? But what sort of
love and what sort of money? The fact is that even the
most accurate calculations on a robotic slide rule cannot exactly predict
where the next bolt of lightning will strike in a storm; but that someone
without any careful and calculating preparation may instinctively know when
to run down the stairs into the cellar just before the random bolt of lightning
hits the VCR.
I once knew a humorous student of the behavioral systems of Dr. Skinner who
had read about government-funded research into the use of trained pigeons
to trigger bombing devices in fighter aircraft. These pigeons were rewarded
by tasty bird food for pecking the red alert button when blips
on a radar screen entered a certain area of the target map. No, my friends:
this is not surrealist drama. This is documented behavioral research. The
psychologists were seeking a way to make objective target decisions during
wartime. They thought that if the pigeons were conditioned to peck the target
only by tasty bird food all emotional errors in judging where the target
was located would thus be eliminated.
At any rate, this humorous young man decided to try this same line of
conditioning with women he wished to induce to reveal their red alert
target areas in a way which was objectively fruitful but did not require
any deeply negociated emotional commitment. In actual fact, he deliberately
rewarded positive response to sexual foreplay with tasty snacks,. Initially,
as he tells it, he did have some success in inducing on target lovemaking
by the use of small gourmet appetizers. But eventually this house of cards
collapsed when the ladies all seemed to remember other engagements which
were not visible near the pizza tray. In other words, an inner causality
emerged which had no basis in strictly non-emotional appetite reinforcement.
This strange behavioral experiment, conducted by a playwright with training
in psychology, actually happened. As a fellow playwright, I was told about
it by the perpetrator after the pigeon-feeding routine had collapsed.
It was ridiculous but he did make an interesting experimental discovery.
People sometimes have ideas independent of direct sensory input.
T